Friday, August 31. 2007
Off the Larry Craig scandal (it just keeps going! and going! and), an interesting short piece on the etiology of bathroom cruising at the L.A. Times.
Continue reading ""Tearoom trade""
Tuesday, August 28. 2007
See?
Craig says "I am not gay, did no wrong"
BOISE, Idaho - Under fire from leaders of his own party, Idaho Sen. Larry Craig on Tuesday the only thing he had done wrong was to plead guilty after a police complaint of lewd conduct in a men's room. He declared, "I am not gay. I never have been gay."
Continue reading "This just in: Senator Larry Craig is NOT GAY!!!"
Antiprincess reminds me of this, roundabout like, with her mention of the ungodly news that Van Halen is back on the road. With Pat Boone opening. No, I made that bit up. Probably.
Anyway! So I've been a-tripping and stumbling down Memory Lane, and it occurred to me to revisit a video that--unlikely, because it sucks, musically and aesthetically, nonetheless--made rather an impact on my tender whenever it was, junior high, high school, psyche.
Continue reading ""Poundcake""
Tuesday, June 5. 2007
For those who are blissfully unaware of the Night-of-the-Living-Dead-like resurrection, online at least, of that branch of radical feminism that thinks "The Transsexual Empire" was, like, a documentary, or something:
Continue reading "-exhale-"
You know, you wouldn't think this would piss me off quite so much as it does. Assholish on general and feminist principles, yes, horrid to a friend, yes; but is this about me?
Heranonymous said...
Here's what's natural...if my husband has sex with a prostitute, my natural instinct is to scratch her eyes out. I don't care if it's legal or illegal. I don't care if she is a feminist or not.
And that is why the stigma will never go away. Women who are trying hard to raise children and keep their families together don't appreciate what you do and wish you would stop. Get it?
Continue reading "SAVE TRADITIONAL HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGES! COLLECT VALUABLE PRIZES!"
Sunday, March 25. 2007
When you sound this tepid (at best) about a good chunk of your base. Via Waiting for Dorothy, Hillary: Sidestepped a question about whether she thinks homosexuality is immoral Wednesday, less than two weeks after telling gay-rights activists she was "proud" to stand by their side.
Clinton was asked the question by ABC News, in the wake of Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Peter Pace's controversial comment that he believed homosexual acts were immoral.
"Well, I'm going to leave that to others to conclude," she said.
...Clinton's spokesman, Philippe Reins, said the New York senator "obviously" disagrees with Pace and that everyone, including the general, "has the right to be wrong, but should not inject their personal beliefs into public policy."
Continue reading " Hey, Hillary. Remind me why I'm supposed to go to the mat for you again"
Friday, March 2. 2007
Over the way at Three Bulls!, commenter The Uncanny Canadian brings us this tidbit from some person somewhere or other moniker'd Boudiccia:
Our dear dear Boudiccia has finally explained the rationale for sodomy, thank goodness. I thought when I last engaged in sodomy, it was just for fun, but it turns out that my motives were much much darker:
I am tired of sodomites and their attempts to catch and rape our children. This is the ultimate goal of their agenda and same sex marriage, rights to adopt children, partner insurance benefits, hate crime legislation, and other demands are steps to this goal. They are not gay at all, for gay is a lovely word meaning happy and jovial, but are self-loathing monsters who hate being the degenerate beings they are and so they take it out on our children, abusing and raping them to make them into the same degenerate creatures as they are. I bet some of them members of the city government in Philedelphia are members of NAMBLA, or why would they make demands for this Boy Scout Council to admit sodomite leaders?
As I said over there, I consider this a (tacky, polyblend) gauntlet:
I am tired of sodomites and their attempts to catch and rape our children. This is the ultimate goal of their agenda
I resent that vicious slander. What kind of unmotivated, unambitious layabouts would we be if -that- were our “ultimate goal?” Ffs, that’s just warming up. That’s not even getting to the -eating.- Let alone the part where we TAKE OVER THE WORLD, PINKY!!! Not to mention the Sadeian mass orgies in the public square, the public disembowelment of Christians, and of course the really snazzy assless black leather uniforms with built-in electrified metal strapons and little pink triangles over each nipple (all three of ‘em; enforced extreme bodymod is also part of the Agenda, natch).
jeez, lady. What do you take us for, anyway?
(crossposted at Fetch me my axe)
|
Comments