Thursday, July 9. 2009The Brian Lehrer Show, the Stonewall riots & transgender rights
I listen to the Brian Lehrer Show almost every morning on WNYC (the New York City affiliate of National Public Radio) and I'm a huge fan of Brian's, so I was excited to get a call from one of his producers inviting me to the Greene Space on June 23 to participate in a panel discussion with a live audience on the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots and the future of the LGBT movement (From Stonewall to Gay Marriage, 6/23/09).
Because there were so many people on the panel, I only managed to get in three sentences during the whole segment. But Brian had me back on the show for a solo appearance on June 26 to talk about transgender rights (Follow-Up Friday: Transgender Rights and Cell Phones and Planes, 6/26/09). In the course of the 20-minute interview, I took the opportunity to talk about the need for enactment of the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA) as well as the Dignity for All Students Act (DASA) -- both of which are pending in the exceptionally dysfunctional New York State Senate. In addition to pending state legislation, Brian and I discussed local issues, including the failure of the openly lesbian New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn to support a progressive and LGBT-inclusive legislative agenda in the City Council. Chris Quinn represents the 3rd Council district, which includes Greenwich Village and Chelsea. Quinn is facing a strong challenge by another 'out' lesbian, community activist Yetta Kurland. More about that race later.
Posted by Pauline Park
in Arts & Culture, Commentary & Opinion, Politics
at
11:18
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Defined tags for this entry: brain lehrer, new york, new york city, public radio, transgender, transgender rights, wnyc
Monday, June 8. 2009Hope? Change?
There’s a raft of life-changing civil rights just waiting to be won by the Gay, Lesbian, Transsexual, Bisexual movement in America and we need the President we helped elect to step up.
Now. The tipping point, the Year One watershed that startled almost as many gay people as straight ones by its passing, was the Prop 8 amendment in California last November. Recriminations about how or why this happened have their place, but here’s the result: overnight 18,000 previously legal same sex marriages entered a new an unprecedented legal limbo, and all future same sex marriages were indefinitely postponed. That this was happening on the same night Obama was elected made it feel like living in two separate Americas simultaneously, like watching the last scene of two Shakespearean dramas, with startlingly different outcomes, superimposed, one over the other. It sucked. Continue reading "Hope? Change?"
Posted by Fastlad
in Commentary & Opinion, Politics
at
06:27
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Defined tags for this entry: immigration equality, obama, prop 8, uafa, uniting american families act
Saturday, May 30. 2009The tide may be turning
"...any movement by an oppressed group to gain equal rights can only go so far until members outside the oppressed group begin to ACTIVELY campaign for the group's rights." When I wrote that line in July 2006 I was voicing my frustration or maybe even outrage that more straight folks were not more actively involved in the struggle for equal marriage but today I'm a little less frustrated.
While the struggle continues, we've made some great progress recently and there's a big push to pass equal marriage in New York among a diverse group of ACTIVELY involved heterosexuals. The couple in the video have become actively involved in the fight for marriage equality and might just be a sign that there's no turning back. As I wrote in 2006 in comparing the fight for marriage equality with civil rights marches in the 1960s, "And one might argue that once non-blacks and blacks began marching hand-in-hand there was no turning back. A visible tide tide had begun to turn in support of major changes at least in terms of the laws of the land." The active involvement of heterosexual couples like the one in the video will ultimately serve to ensure that all people are treated equal because when anyone group is not treated equally everyone's equality is in jeopardy.
Posted by Sascha
in Commentary & Opinion, Politics, Videos
at
14:53
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Defined tags for this entry: astoria, heterosexual, jeremiah frei-pearson, karla mosley, marriage equality, the right to love video
Friday, April 10. 2009One Step Back, Two Steps Forward
The recent moves by Iowa's Supreme Court and Vermont's legislature to allow same-sex unions sparked an acquaintance of mine to post the following Facebook status: "[I have] no feelings on the spate of gay marriage developments. It is an issue of luxury salient only for an exercise in rhetorical flourish." For him, marriage is some distant frontier, less prescient than the health care crisis, the economy, and the passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would prohibit discrimination of employees based on sexual orientation. But while he prefers not to celebrate what is, for him, simply an abstraction (the issues of hospital visitation, inheritance, and the various other rights enjoyed by legally married couples seemed lost on him), the recent moves by Iowa and Vermont, the first state to pass legislation legalizing same-sex unions, symbolize two steps forward in the fight for civil rights following the crushing blow of the passage of Proposition 8 in California last fall. The recent developments have renewed the debate in the Golden State. Gay marriage supporters are hoping the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling will set a prescedent that might lead to the California courts overruling the ballot initiative that passed with 52 percent with overwhelming support of the Mormon Church last November. The California Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage last May led to the passage of Prop 8 and was also cited by the Iowa court in their recent decision. States may be sovereign, but the recent developments prove that what happens in one state can, and does, affect the entire nation. And of course, the oppression of one group is the oppression of all.
Posted by Sal Paradise
in Commentary & Opinion, News, Politics
at
16:43
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Thursday, February 19. 2009Transphobic PETA AdRemember a while back ago when I posted that Apple ad that used supermodel Gisele Bundchen juxtaposed with a very masculine looking male model in a dress for a cheap gender laugh? Yeah I figured you didn't so watch it now then read about PETA's Transphobic ad on The Colonic. Saturday, November 15. 2008HISTORIC TRAGIC - Thoughts on the 2008 electionYou end up like a dog that’s been beat too muchI have a feeling that the word “historic” is going to become as overused in the coming weeks and years as “tragic” was in referring to “the events of…” you know the rest. Both words appropriately describe the outcome of the 2008 U.S. elections, but I will try to find others. I started watching election returns while unpacking winter clothes, and gasped as Pennsylvania was called for Obama, knowing that meant he probably won. I didn’t vote for him: I didn’t like his non-universal health care plan; his timetable for withdrawal from Iraq seemed vague; his plan for addressing climate change and renewable energy even more vague; and he didn’t support equal marriage rights for all. I proudly voted for Cynthia McKinney and the Green Party, whose positions are in alignment with my values. Another gasp when Virginia was called. This the state which until just 41 years ago outlawed inter-racial marriage. Mildred Delores, a black woman, married Richard Loving, a white man in Washington D.C. in 1958 to avoid the marriage ban. But upon their return to Virginia, police raided their home in the middle of the night, and arrested them - for being married. They were later convicted. Yes, the police actually invaded their home hoping to catch them having sex, also a crime. This isn’t ancient history, this isn’t slave times, this is in my lifetime. This could have happened to Barack Obama’s parents if they lived in Virginia. In 1967 the United States Supreme Court overturned the conviction. In its decision, the Court wrote that marriage is one of the “basic civil rights of man.” And that “to deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive the State’s citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.” Is it such a stretch to substitute “another race” with “same sex”? Without that ruling who knows when, if ever, Virginia would have decriminalized interracial marriage. And now in 2008 Obama has won the state! Remarkable! (Note that despite the Supreme Court ruling laws like Virginia’s remained on the books in several states until 2000, when Alabama became the last state to repeal its law against mixed-race marriage. Good ol’ Alabama. Forever bringing up the rear.) So by this time things began to feel so momentous I needed to join friends at the local bar, which was packed with cheering and clapping people watching the results come in on the television. When a dramatic fire broke out down the block, only half the people left the bar to watch the fire; the rest, including me, remained glued to the television waiting for Obama’s speech. Yet another powerful moment was seeing Jesse Jackson, who was there when Martin Luther King Jr. was shot in the motel in Memphis, also waiting for Obama, with tears streaming down his cheeks. I went home elated that intelligence would return to the White House, after a long eight year drought. And while it is great to have that long chain of white male heads of state broken, on another level it really didn’t matter to me. I mean, look at Clarence Thomas, or Condoleezza Rice, or even Colin Powell, who lied to the world about Iraq. People whose politics and policies I abhor don’t get my support simply for representing a minority group. So my excitement for Obama went beyond the novelty of his race, and centered on his obvious intelligence and leadership qualities. I think I went to bed around 2:30 a.m., before west coast returns were all in. (By the way, it is being said that Condoleezza Rice was rejected from consideration as John McCain’s running mate because she may be a lesbian. So they chose a woman who did not know that Africa was a continent over a PhD with 30 years of international and government experience who might be gay.) Continue reading "HISTORIC TRAGIC - Thoughts on the 2008 election"
Posted by Guest Contributors
in Commentary & Opinion, Politics
at
11:46
| Comment (1)
| Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday, September 24. 2008Family Equality Council on Clay Aiken
While the gossip rags pat themselves on the backs for claiming to know Clay Aiken was gay the first time he stepped onto the American Idol stage five years ago, the singer's admission in the upcoming issue of People magazine that he is indeed homosexual raises some larger issues for the LGBT community. In a statement, Executive Director of the Family Equality Council Jennifer Chrisler said: "Much like Rosie O'Donnell, the announcement that Clay Aiken is gay reinforces a simple reality: the American public can no longer say it does not know a gay or lesbian parent. Clay Aiken's desire to raise a child in an open and honest manner will make his life, and his son's, all the better. We hope he and his son find all the happiness they deserve, and the Family Equality Council will work toward the day that Clay and Parker Foster Aiken can enjoy the same rights as other American families." Long before he chose to father a child with his 50-year-old female pal Jaymes Foster, many in the media and the public suspected Aiken was gay, and even before pictures from a webcam conversation surfaced online, it was pretty obvious that Aiken was not a ladies man. The idea that Aiken and O'Donnell are gay isn't all that shocking; teenage girls across the country likely won't be burning their Measure of a Man CDs in the town square this week. But what about the countless other actors, musicians and politicians who have (thus far successfully) kept their sexuality under wraps? Humanizing the face of the LGBT community is the first step toward tolerance and acceptance and as long as public figures in positions of power bite their tongues, the cycle of silence, violence and fear will continue.
Posted by Sal Paradise
in Commentary & Opinion, Gossip, News
at
10:05
| Comment (1)
| Trackbacks (0)
Friday, September 12. 2008Will the real McCain please stand up?
In the primary against Mayor Guilani and Gov. Romney McCain stressed his national security experience and trashed mayors and governors as being unqualified in dealing with national security, "I am prepared. I am prepared. I need no on-the-job training. I wasn't a mayor for a short period of time. I wasn't a governor for a short period of time."
As we all know his running mate, Sarah Palin, is one of those mayors and governors with no national security experience. I guess he changed his tune. Opportunist? Liar? Flip flopper? Source: Huffington Post
Posted by Sascha
in Commentary & Opinion, News, Politics, Videos
at
23:20
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Defined tags for this entry: 2008 republican debate, flip-flop, governors, liar, mayors, mccain, national security, sara palin
Tuesday, August 26. 2008Arkansas Makes a Mockery of Foster Care
The Arkansas Family Council's "Gold Standard"
The Associated Press reported today that Arkansas Secretary of State Charlie Daniels certified a proposal that would place a measure prohibiting unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children on the state's November ballot. "We need to publicly affirm the gold standard of rearing children whenever we can. The state standard should be as close to that gold standard of married mom and dad homes as possible," Arkansas Family Council President Jerry Cox said. The organization's campaign is a response to a 2006 Arkansas Supreme Court decision that ruled against a state law preventing gays and lesbians from becoming foster parents. Though the new measure doesn't specifically address same-sex couples, it's clearly aimed at gays and lesbians as Arkansas currently prohibits gay marriage and does not recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages. The proposal is not only another blow to civil rights but to the 6,500 children currently in Arkansas's foster care system. The state's Department of Human Services is currently investigating the deaths of four separate children living in foster care in Arkansas, including at least two involving allegations of physical abuse (DHS's child abuse investigation division is understaffed and behind on addressing complaints). According to Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, 1,000 children have grown to become adults in the last five years in the state without ever being placed in a permanent home; children who outgrow the foster care system are statistically more likely to become homeless or engage in criminal activity. It seems that the "gold standard" of child rearing should be to actually rear them, without the fear of abuse or neglect—something Cox and his group seem determined to undercut in the name of preserving their so-called sacred traditions.
Posted by Sal Paradise
in Commentary & Opinion, News, Politics
at
14:04
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Saturday, August 9. 2008Our Beef with Beefalo Bob's Catering
We have to question the taste level of anyone who picks a place called Beefalo Bob's (and whose mascot is a cow dressed up in a cowboy hat) to cater his or her wedding reception, but it turns out that the Baltimore, Maryland company might be even more judgmental than we are!
Laura and Leah, friends of Big Queer who were set up on a blind date by Leah's sister after Laura answered a furniture ad in the local paper three years ago, hired Beefalo Bob's to cater their reception in September. The company allegedly told the couple that they were fine with serving a same-sex "commitment ceremony" but refused to cater the event if Laura and Leah pursued a legal marriage in California. Their reason? According to Laura, Beefalo Bob's doesn't want to participate in any "politically-charged" or "unlawful" practices. Funny, we thought the role of a caterer was to bring the food, serve it and keep their mouths shut, and the last thing Laura and Leah want to do is politicize such an important personal moment in their lives. The pair withdrew their contract and got their deposit back. Continue reading "Our Beef with Beefalo Bob's Catering"
(Page 1 of 4, totaling 35 entries)
» next page
|
SupportersAuthorsLinks We LikeBen Yee Public Advocate NYC
Rey Pamatmat Playwright Bart's Trabaca Chroma Queer Literary Journal Desperate Kingdoms> Doug Ireland> Immigration Equality The Lesbian and Gay Foundation UK Little Yellow Different My Porch Blog Pam's House Blend play rey play Queer Podcasting Directory Queer Day The Republic of T YVY Mag Ad Links The Maneuver - film about the man behind Heimlich Maneuver Web Usability Consultants Holiday Promotional Products & Business Gifts SponsorsSyndicate This BlogBlog Administration |
About Big Queer |
Comments