And apparently they don't like us very much. Maine's gay marriage law, passed by the state legislature and signed by the Governor John Baldacci earlier this year, was repealed when voters took to the polls to vote yesterday. It pains me that the majority is continued to allow to vote on minority rights issues. And it pains me even more that I had to update our Big Queer Map.
Yesterday, New Hampshire became the sixth state in the union to allow same-sex marriage. The new legislation, passed by the state House and Senate and signed by the governor, will take effect on January 1st, 2010. In celebration of each new victory and as a reminder of how far we still have to go, Big Queer has decided to start tallying the states that legalize gay marriage with our Big Queer Map.
States that allow gay marriage: Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire.
If you're on Facebook or Twitter, you were no doubt inundated with pithy responses following yesterday's announcement that California's Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8. Some of my favorites: "California can suck it," "Shame on them!," "Fuck California," "SO over California," ":(," and my personal favorite, "Ha ha, California. Iowa is more liberal than you. Epic fail." It's that last one that seemed to make the most sense to me. Yes, this was another setback in the fight for marriage equality in the country's most populace state, and the court's logic that last November's referendum doesn't fundamentally alter equal rights under the state Constitution but simply amends it is flawed. The judgment creates a legal class of citizens (to say nothing of creating a special class of gay citizens who are allowed to remain married), denies equal protection, and plainly contradicts the language of the Constitution. But my friend's admittedly unemotional observation points to the fact that even if the people and legal system of California are still struggling with this no-brainer issue, Prop 8 and the subsequent fallout have created a wave of progress for gays and marriage equality in the U.S. The Northeast is where our founding fathers conceived and composed the nation's Constitution and Bill of Rights, and it's now where real progress is being made on this front, with older and wiser states Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine having all recognized gay marriage, and New York and New Hampshire close behind. It won't be California, that bastion of so-called liberalism, that's going to pave the way.
Watch this video to find out what we can expect to happen next, now that the California's Supreme Court has upheld it's ruling on Prop 8, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognised in California." And this ruling definitely makes the repealing of DOMA more important than ever.
A nine-year-old in Denver, Colorado has become an unlikely posterchild (literally) for marriage equality. Ethan McNamee of Montclair Elementary School organized a rally in support of same-sex marriage at his school reportedly after hearing slurs on the playground. There's an unmarried gay couple in his neighborhood as well, which led to McNamee's desire to speak out on the issue. Controversy over whether the third-grader is being used by his parents or teachers as a mouthpiece for a mature debate is inevitable, but it's evident from news report footage that McNamee is confident in what he believes and is wise beyond his mere nine years. We see a lot more activism in his future!
On the same day that yet another New England state, New Hampshire, inched closer to allowing same-sex marriage, a representative from another state, North Carolina, reminded us of the ugly bigotry that still pervades our great country. Rep. Virgina Foxx took to the floor of the House of Representatives during a debate on the expansion of hate crimes legislation and said the following: "The hate crimes bill that's called the Matthew Shepard bill is named after a very unfortunate incident that happened where a young man was killed, but we know that that young man was killed in the commitment of a robbery. It wasn't because he was gay. This--the bill was named for him, hate crimes bill was named for him, but it's really a hoax that continues to be used as an excuse for passing these bills." Not only were her statements patently untrue, and not only was her use of the term "we" a glaring reminder of how and why the Republican brand has become synonymous with intolerance and ill-conceived rhetoric, but Foxx performed her obscene, cruel and pathetically out-of-touch diatribe in front Shepard's mother, Judy Shepard. The perpetrators of the "very unfortunate incident" of Shepard's brutal murder admitted that they killed the gay 21-year-old in 1998 because he was homosexual, and for that they were sentenced to life in prison without parole. As Salon's Joan Walsh said on Hardball with Chris Matthews last night: It's Rep. Foxx that's the hoax.
Sometimes it's impossible to satirize something that is as inherently ridiculous as the National Organization for Marriage's anti-gay marriage ad, which warns of the dangers of gay marriage supporters who wish to take things "further," and promotes a "rainbow coalition" that wishes to protect the sacred institution of marriage...
...but it doesn't mean that we shouldn't try! And Stephen Colbert certainly did. Check out his scathing parody of the ad:
With New York governor David Paterson announcing a bill to legalize gay marriage in his state this week, and former John McCain strategist Steve Schmidt planning to deliver a pro-gay marriage address to Log Cabin Republicans, the storm isn't just coming. It's here.
The recent moves by Iowa's Supreme Court and Vermont's legislature to allow same-sex unions sparked an acquaintance of mine to post the following Facebook status: "[I have] no feelings on the spate of gay marriage developments. It is an issue of luxury salient only for an exercise in rhetorical flourish." For him, marriage is some distant frontier, less prescient than the health care crisis, the economy, and the passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would prohibit discrimination of employees based on sexual orientation. But while he prefers not to celebrate what is, for him, simply an abstraction (the issues of hospital visitation, inheritance, and the various other rights enjoyed by legally married couples seemed lost on him), the recent moves by Iowa and Vermont, the first state to pass legislation legalizing same-sex unions, symbolize two steps forward in the fight for civil rights following the crushing blow of the passage of Proposition 8 in California last fall. The recent developments have renewed the debate in the Golden State. Gay marriage supporters are hoping the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling will set a prescedent that might lead to the California courts overruling the ballot initiative that passed with 52 percent with overwhelming support of the Mormon Church last November. The California Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage last May led to the passage of Prop 8 and was also cited by the Iowa court in their recent decision. States may be sovereign, but the recent developments prove that what happens in one state can, and does, affect the entire nation. And of course, the oppression of one group is the oppression of all.
Former presidential nominee and Massachusetts State Senator John Kerry has been a long-time supporter of the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA), which earned a mainstream press endorsement by The Washington Post last week, and now the outspoken Democrat has taken on the challenge of trying to overturn a federal judge's decision to send Genesio "Junior" Oliveira back to Brazil after the man was denied asylum. (Read Kerry's statement on the issue at The Huffington Post.) Oliveira claims he was raped by a Brazilian doctor, and despite the country's anti-discrimination laws, violence against gays and lesbians continues at an alarming rate, including 186 murders last year. Oliveira is married to Tim Coco, and Kerry is pressuring Attorney General Eric Holder to overrule Immigration Judge Francis Cramer's rejection of Oliveira's plea for asylum. Coco has made it a personal crusade to change U.S. law so that gay couples can sponsor their partners for permanent immigration. It's an issue that our friends over at Immigration Equality have been courageously working on, and one that's close to our hearts.
The Self-Involved Bourgeois Airhead Award for December 2008 goes to Rufus Wainright. The decision is unanimous and he certainly deserves it. In an interview with the right leaning New York Press this week he said:
“Oddly enough, I’m actually not a huge gay marriage supporter. I personally don’t want to get married but I think that any law or amendment to the constitution that deals with sex and love should just be banned in general. I don’t think any government should encroach on what goes on in the bedroom at all. Frankly, if you want to marry a dog, why don’t you go ahead and marry a dog, I don’t care. I’m a complete libertarian and so I really disagree with it.”
Oddly enough I am not married to my American partner because the law here currently forbids it, Rufus. Oddly enough, as a foreign national (like you Rufus, because I’ve just remembered you’re Canadian, but you’re also – crucially – famous and rich) I can see the value of it.
It would have saved me tens of thousands of dollars I could ill afford in legal fees to immigration attorneys. I could have used that money to do other things. I might have bought a nice pair of Ray Bans or an opera ticket. I mean did you even know that heterosexual couples in bi-national relationships can pay $30 and get hitched in city hall – immigration’s usually a snap for them – but homosexual couples face stiff lawyers fees, uncertainty, discrimination, and chance. Every day. We don’t even have the luxury of idle speculation about man on dog hypothetical nuptials because we’re – I dunno – so busy fighting for our fucking lives.
Warning: Use of undefined constant CHARSET_NATIVE - assumed 'CHARSET_NATIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/bigqueer/www/www/serendipity_config.inc.php on line 171
Comments